If a healthcare or social service provider suspects that a patient or client has an SUD, the provider should ensure that the client receives formal treatment.
Once the client receives formal treatment—or if he or she refuses or cannot afford treatment— the provider’s next step is to facilitate involvement in a mutual support group.
Matching clients to treatment based solely on gender, motivation, cognitive impairment, or other such characteristics has not been proved to be effective.26,27 Clients who are “philosophically well matched” to a mutual support group are more likely to actively participate in that group.6
Thus, the best way to help a client benefit from mutual support groups is to encourage increased participation in his or her chosen group.
Providers can increase their knowledge of mutual support groups, and thus their ability to make informed referrals, by doing the following:
* Become familiar with the different types of support groups and their philosophies.28n Most groups’ Web sites describe their philosophies and have online publications (see list of mutual support group Web sites on page 2).
* Determine which groups are active locally. Most groups’ Web sites have meeting locator services.
* Find out about the different types of meetings available within local mutual support groups (e.g., which meetings are for women only).1,29
* Establish contacts in local mutual support groups. AA and NA in particular have committees whose members work with healthcare and social service providers to get clients to meetings and to provide information to providers.28
* Attend open meetings to expand knowledge of mutual support groups and how local meetings are conducted.1
Understanding the needs and beliefs of clients with SUDs helps providers make informed referrals.1 Providers should find out clients’ experiences with mutual support groups, their concerns and misconceptions about mutual support groups, and their personal beliefs.
Persons who agree with the group’s belief system are more likely to participate and, thus, more likely to have better outcomes.6 For example, having strong religious beliefs is related to greater participation in the spiritually based 12-Step programs and WFS.
In contrast, religiosity was less effective in increasing participation in SMART Recovery groups and decreased participation in SOS.6 Whether the client is participating in medication-assisted treatment (MAT) is another consideration when making a referral to a mutual support group, because some groups may be more supportive of MAT than others.
For example, individuals being treated with methadone for opioid dependence may be more comfortable attending a meeting of Methadone Anonymous, whose members understand the benefits of opioid pharmacotherapy. To improve the client’s chances of attending a meeting, providers can:
* Present more than one choice when making referrals and encourage clients to attend several meetings before making any judgments about the groups.29 Clients should be encouraged to attend different groups until they find one in which they are comfortable.1
* Initiate the first conversation between a client and a support group contact person. Having a mutual support group member speak to a client by phone during the office visit may increase the likelihood that the client will attend the support group meeting.1,28
* Refer family members or others who may be affected by the client’s substance use. Their involvement may encourage participation by providing social support (see list of mutual support group Web sites for families, friends, and significant others on page 2).
Once clients are attending a group they are comfortable with, the provider should actively encourage the clients’ support group experiences by scheduling followup visits to talk about their experiences and providing positive feedback.
Clients should be asked about details—how many meetings are they attending, do they have a sponsor, are they abstinent.28 Gentle, positive encouragement will likely increase participation. Providers should watch for signs of an impending relapse, such as a reluctance to discuss group participation or periods of extreme stress.4
By offering knowledgeable advice and informed referrals and taking an ongoing, active interest in clients’ support group experiences, providers can make a difference in their clients’ recovery.
Notes1Humphreys, K. (2004). Circles of recovery: Self-help organizations for addictions. London: Cambridge University Press.
2Alcoholics Anonymous World Services. (n.d.). Alcoholics Anonymous World Services Web site. Retrieved November 16, 2007, from http://www.aa.org
3Narcotics Anonymous World Services. (n.d.). Narcotics Anonymous World Services Web site. Retrieved November 16, 2007, from http://www.na.org
4Schulz, J. E. (2003). Twelve Step programs and other recovery-oriented interventions. In A. W. Graham, T. K. Schultz, M. F. Mayo-Smith, R. K. Ries, & B. B. Wilford (Eds.), Principles of addiction medicine, Third Edition (pp. 941−954). Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc.
5Garrett, F. (n.d.). Your first AA meeting: An unofficial guide for the perplexed. Retrieved November 16, 2007, from http://www.bma-wellness.com/papers/First_AA_Meetinghtml
6Atkins, R. G., & Hawdon, J. E. (2007). Religiosity and participation in mutual-aid support groups for addiction. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(3), 321−331.
7Kitchin, H. A. (2002). Alcoholics Anonymous discourse and members’ resistance in a virtual community: Exploring tensions between theory and practice. Contemporary Drug Problems, 29, 749−778.
8Kaskutas, L. A. (1994). What do women get out of self-help? Their reasons for attending Women for Sobriety and Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11(3), 185−195.
9Women for Sobriety. (n.d.). Women for Sobriety Web site. Retrieved November 16, 2007, from http://www. womenforsobriety.org
10SMART Recovery. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions about SMART Recovery®. Retrieved November 16, 2007, from http://www.smartrecovery.org/resources/faqhtm
11Secular Organizations for Sobriety/Save Our Selves. (2000). An overview of SOS: A self-empowerment approach to recovery. Hollywood, CA: Author.
12Secular Organizations for Sobriety/Save Our Selves. (2000). SOS guidebook for group leaders. Hollywood, CA: Author.
13Secular Organizations for Sobriety/Save Our Selves. (n.d.). Secular Organizations for Sobriety/Save Our Selves Web site. Retrieved November 28, 2007, from http://www.sossobriety.org
14LifeRing. (n.d.). Welcome to LifeRing: LifeRing in a nutshell. Oakland, CA: LifeRing Service Center.
15Kelly, J. F., Stout, R., Zywiak, W., & Schneider, R. (2006). A 3-year study of addiction mutual-help group participation following intensive outpatient treatment. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 30(8), 1381−1392.
16Laudet, A. B., Cleland, C. M., Magura, S., Vogel, H. S., & Knight, E. L. (2004). Social support mediates the effects of dual-focus mutual aid groups on abstinence from substance use. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(3/4), 175−185.
17Witbrodt, J., & Kaskutas, L. A. (2005). Does diagnosis matter? Differential effects of 12-Step participation and social networks on abstinence. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31(4), 685−707.
18Zemore, S. E., Kaskutas, L. A., & Ammon, L. N. (2004). In 12-Step groups, helping helps the helper. Addiction, 99(8), 1015−1023.
19Connors, G. J., & Dermen, K. H. (1996). Characteristics of participants in secular organizations for sobriety (SOS). American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 22(2), 281–295.
20Kaskutas, L. A. (1996). A road less traveled: Choosing the “Women for Sobriety” program. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(1), 77−94.
21Humphreys, K., & Moos, R. H. (2007). Encouraging posttreatment self-help group involvement to reduce demand for continuing care services: Two-year clinical and utilization outcomes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31(1), 64−68.
22Galanter, M., Egelko, S., & Edwards, H. (1993). Rational Recovery: Alternative to AA for addiction? American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 19(4), 499−510.
23Tonigan, J. S., Miller, W. R., & Connors, G. J. (2000). Project MATCH client impressions about Alcoholics Anonymous: Measurement issues and relationship to treatment outcome. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 18, 25−41.
24McKellar, J., Stewart, E., & Humphreys, K. (2003). Alcoholics Anonymous involvement an d positive alcohol-related outcomes: Cause, consequence, or just a correlate? A prospective 2-year study of 2,319 alcohol-dependent men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 302−308.
25Pagano, M. E., Friend, K. B., Tonigan, J. S., & Stout, R. L. (2004). Helping other alcoholics in Alcoholics Anonymous and drinking outcomes: Findings from Project MATCH. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 65(6), 766−773.
26Magura, S. (2007). The relationship between substance user treatment and 12-Step fellowships: Current knowledge and research questions. Substance Use & Misuse, 42, 343−360.
27Project MATCH Research Group. (1996). Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses. Addiction, 92(12), 1671−1698.
28Chappel, J. N., & DuPont, R. L. (1999). Twelve-step and mutual-help programs for ad dictive disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 22(2), 425−446.
29Laudet, A. B. (2003). Attitudes and beliefs about 12-Step groups among addiction treatment clients and clinicians: Toward identifying obstacles to participation. Substance Use & Misuse, 38(14), 2017−2047.
Substance Abuse in Brief Fact Sheet is produced under contract number 270-04-7049 by JBS International, Inc., and The CDM Group, Inc., for the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
Disclaimer: The views, opinions, and content expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or policies of CSAT, SAMHSA, or DHHS. No official support of or endorsement by CSAT, SAMHSA, or DHHS for these opinions or for particular instruments, software, or resources is intended or should be inferred.
Public Domain Notice: All materials appearing in this volume except those taken directly from copyrighted sources are in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA/CSAT or the authors. Citation of the source is appreciated.
However, this publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific, written authorization of the Office of Communications, SAMHSA, DHHS. Electronic Access: This publication may be downloaded at http://www.samhsa.gov/shin and http://www.kap.samhsa.gov.
Recommended Citation: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (2008). An Introduction to Mutual Support Groups for Alcohol and Drug Abuse. Substance Abuse in Brief Fact Sheet, Volume 5, Issue 1. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
To order additional copies of Substance Abuse in Brief Fact Sheet and other Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) products, contact SAMHSA’s Health Information Network 1-877-SAMHSA-7 (1-877-726-4727) (English and Español) Web site: http://www.samhsa.gov/shin SAMHSA’s National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information P.O. Box 2345 Rockville, MD 20847-2345 Phone: 800-729-6686, TDD: 800-487-4889 Fax: 240-221-4292 Substance Abuse in Brief Fact Sheet DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 08-4336 Printed 2008
Substance Abuse in Brief Fact Sheet Spring 2008, Volume 5, Issue 1